He challenged research subjects to connect all nine dots using just four straight lines without lifting their pencils from the page.
Of course, in real life you wont find boxes.
Today many people are familiar with this puzzle and its solution.
They are much more common than you probably think.No one, that is, before two different research Clarke Burnham with Kenneth Davis, and Joseph Alba with Robert Weisbergran another experiment using the same puzzle but a different research procedure.Although studying is considered a legitimate scientific nowadays, it is still a very young one.Copyright 2014 la brea tar pits coupon discount Drew Boyd.That this advice is useless when actually trying to solve a problem involving a real box should effectively have killed off the much widely disseminatedand therefore, much more dangerousmetaphor that out-of-the-box thinking spurs creativity.
From, inside the Box: A Proven System of Creativity for Breakthrough Results.
Or so their consultants would have them believe.
Yet participants performance was not improved even when they were given specific instructions to.
Lets look a little more closely at these surprising results.
Would you like to guess the percentage of the participants in the second group who solved the puzzle correctly?
Speakers, trainers, training program developers, organizational consultants, and university professors all had much to say about the vast benefits of outside-the-box thinking.The second group was told that the solution required the lines to be drawn outside the imaginary box bordering the dot array.But you will find numerous situations where a creative breakthrough is staring you in the face.Guilford was one of the first academic researchers who dared to conduct a study of creativity.Solving this problem requires people to literally think outside the box.
Because the solution is, in hindsight, deceptively simple, clients tended to admit they should have thought of it themselves.